Single space, apa style,each question should have 200 words for each question and have some sources. Question 1 Imagine you are a judge and are allowing an eyewitness psychological expert to testify. What factors would you consider appropiate for the expert to testify about ? What factors would you disallow testimony? 2 question is it more important to reduce falsw positive or false negative errors in lie detection? What are the consequences of each type of error? Question 3 If we could prove that third degree tactics or outright torture was effective in extracting true confessions from criminal suspects(including terrorists),would you be in favor of using such techniques?would the type of crime factor into your decision?If such tactics worked,should they be permitted in our legal system? Question 4 In pretial questionaires of potential jurors,how far should lawyers and jury consultants be permittedto go? Should they be allowed to administer test and or meadures(ie personality tests etc)Should they be able to ask questions about political views?Rigious views? Sexual behavior? Family history?